Home  Donate  New  Search  Gallery  Reviews  How-To  Books  Links  Workshops  About  Contact

Nikon 16mm f/2.8
Fisheye-NIKKOR (1979-1998)
© 2013 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.

Intro   Specs   Performance   Recommendations

Please help KenRockwell..com

Nikon 16mm f/2.8

Nikon 16mm f/2.8 AI-s (FX, DX and 35mm coverage, rear bayonet filters, 11 oz./310 g, 1'/0.3 m close focus, about $450 used). enlarge. I'd get it at this link directly to them at eBay (see How to Win at eBay) or possibly at Adorama.

This free website's biggest source of support is when you use those or any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live — but I receive nothing for my efforts if you buy elsewhere. I'm not NPR; I get no government hand-outs and run no pledge drives to support my research, so please always use any of these links for the best prices and service whenever you get anything. Thanks for helping me help you! Ken.

August 2013   Nikon Reviews   Nikon Lenses    All Reviews

Newest Model: 16mm f/2.8 AF-D (1993-)

Older model: 16mm f/3.5 (1973-1979)


Introduction         top

Intro   Specs   Performance   Recommendations

Adorama pays top dollar for your used gear.

B&H Photo - Video - Pro Audio
I use these stores. I can't vouch for ads below.

This is a fun and useful lens for FX digital and 35mm. Get the 10.5mm for DX digital.

It fills the entire film frame with a useful image, unlike the 8mm fisheye which gives just a silly circle in the middle of the frame. It offers all the convenience of through-the-lens viewing and metering, just like every other popular lens. It's also as small as a regular lens, and if you are used to zooms, even smaller than your zoom.

For you math professors, here's the formulae that represent how the subject maps to the image in a poerfect fisheye:

d = f * theta

theta = d/f

d = image displacement on film, mm, from the center of the image

f = focal length, mm

theta = radians displacement from the axis of the lens.


Specifications         top

Intro   Specs   Performance   Recommendations



8 elements in 5 groups. The AF version adds close range correction, or CRC.



f/2.8 - f/22



7 blades.



2.5" around (63.5mm) by 2.4" (62.5mm) long.



11 oz. (310g)

Performance         top

Intro   Specs   Performance   Recommendations

It has no ghosts or flare, so feel free to keep the sun in your images.

I found the following performance with a sample bought new in 1994:

f/2.8: nice center, fuzzy on the sides due to coma. Some typical light falloff.
f/4: still about as fuzzy on sides, less light falloff
f/5.6: nice out to sides, light falloff gone
f/8: good all over; about as good as it gets
f/16-22 maybe softer on edges

I find a lot of variation in performance sample-to-sample.

The first one I bought in 1984 was sharp at all apertures.

In 1991 I was thrown to the ground by a flying Christo Umbrella two feet away from a woman who was killed by it. Of course you'll probably point out that it serves me right for being stupid enough to be photographing this from so close with a fisheye lens, but hey, this was a natural disaster that hadn't happened yet, and as with all freak accidents (and the Spanish Inquisition) no one expects them to happen. In any case, the front of my fisheye was crushed and the front element fractured. The fact that I was bleeding was irrelevant; I was disturbed that my lens was destroyed.

Golly, it still worked just fine. Even though the front element was fractured clear through, it turns out that the fracture didn't go through any part of the element that was needed for the image. The front element protector, or hood, was also completely crushed. I tested the lens thoroughly and it was fine. I sent it to Nikon USA who sent it to Nikon Japan for a couple of months to replace the front element. It came back looking brand new, but unfortunately the optical performance was now poor. It was fuzzy in the corners at large apertures. I sent it back to Nikon several times who cheerfully checked it ant assured me it was fine, but even though it may have met commercial standards it didn't meet mine. I sold it to a less picky professional photographer and made it clear that I wasn't happy with the corner sharpness, but as the buyer pointed out, that wasn't really important to him with a fisheye lens, duh.

I bought another one in 1994. That one also wasn't too hot in the corners wide open, and I tried to make sure that I always stopped down a few stops. I sold that one, too, for about as much as I can buy a new AF version.


Curvature of field

It seems that the subject field curves farther away as you leave the center. IN other words, focus on something a few feet away in the center, and the distant objects at the sides will be in better focus.


Recommendations         top

Intro   Specs   Performance   Recommendations

I get sharp results handheld at 1/15. Since it's soft in the corners at larger apertures I use this lens in shutter priority (S) mode at 1/15 second. I set the lens to f/11, so that a superior camera like the FA with cybernetic override will then choose faster shutter speeds once f/11 is reached. If you only have an F4 or F5 you'll have to futz manually with this.

Don't loose the lens cap. Nikon will hit you up for $50 to replace it. When I bought a 16mm in 1984 it came with a nice, tight metal cap. Today Nikon has replaced that with a cheap piece of plastic that neither fits nor keep out dust very well, and they still want $50 for it. Keep a keen eye: I found a plastic one in a junk box at Samy's in LA and it only cost me a dollar. I use little pieces of self-stick felt on the inside of the cap to help them stay on the lens better.

If you've found the time, effort and expense I incur researching and sharing all this information for free, this free website's biggest source of support is when you use this link to get yours at eBay as I did, or use or any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. Please always use these links when getting any of your gear so I can continue to share what I know for free — because I receive nothing for my efforts if you buy elsewhere. I'm not NPR; I don't get any government grants or have annoying fund drives to help me research and give all this information away for free.


Help me help you         top

I support my growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem.

The biggest help is when you use any of these links when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. It costs you nothing, and is this site's, and thus my family's, biggest source of support. These places have the best prices and service, which is why I've used them since before this website existed. I recommend them all personally.

If you find this page as helpful as a book you might have had to buy or a workshop you may have had to take, feel free to help me continue helping everyone.

If you've gotten your gear through one of my links or helped otherwise, you're family. It's great people like you who allow me to keep adding to this site full-time. Thanks!

If you haven't helped yet, please do, and consider helping me with a gift of $5.00.

As this page is copyrighted and formally registered, it is unlawful to make copies, especially in the form of printouts for personal use. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you are granted one-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof. Thank you!


Thanks for reading!



Mr. & Mrs. Ken Rockwell, Ryan and Katie.


Home  Donate  New  Search  Gallery  Reviews  How-To  Books  Links  Workshops  About  Contact